Kestabilan mssql ngan mysql

[bart]

aku nak tanya ko orang mana lagi lebih stabil antar dua² rdbms ini, pas tu kalu aku pakai mysql dalam windows macam mana kestabilan dia ok tak..

ade tak pree software nak convert data dari mssql ke mysql atau sebalik nye atau access ke mysql

[ed_thix]

mysql utk development bleh aaa kat windows, tapi kalau nak stable betul betul, better *nix la .....

[awanferra]

dulu, ada satu org ni buat performance test antara beberapa rdbms..
antaranya mysql 4.0, sql server (2000 kot), oracle (9 kot).
Macam tak percaya, mysql menang...

[mnajem]

performance overall ke speed awanferra?

kalo speed,mysql memang ye.

overall (don't take into account about cost,amik kira soal stability)

aku rasa Oracle.Tapi mahal bukan main.tu orang carik prosgreSQL.

[buzz]

Originally posted by awanferra
dulu, ada satu org ni buat performance test antara beberapa rdbms..
antaranya mysql 4.0, sql server (2000 kot), oracle (9 kot).
Macam tak percaya, mysql menang...

I would double check that. Multi-master configurations are totally different from master-slave config, apalagi kalau stand alone nyer. To do multimaster live/hot replication at enterprise level hardware is, so far, achieved only by commercial enterprise level rdbms.

mysql 4, even tho coder die announce that it's production ready, banyak lagi isuue yg timbul... plus the db doesn't support schema.. and featurewise yg die org nak masukkan utk 4.0 die anjakkan ke 5.0

may be this can help... (kat user comment)
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html


ni yg lama sikit.. tapi ok gak utk rujukan,
mysql vs oracle
http://det-dbalice.if.pw.edu.pl/det-dbalice/documents/all/html/db_compare/db_compar_toc.html

[gerg]

kalau nak convert dr apa² database yang support kat odbc ko tu ke mysql guna SQLyog